What is Dr. Collins's initial stance on reducing appointment times?

She is concerned about complex cases being rushed.

She thinks it's a straightforward solution to reduce waiting lists.

She believes it could be beneficial for patient care.

She is skeptical of uncritically adopting strategies from other hospitals.

What is Mr. Bennett's main argument for reducing appointment times?

It will allow more patients to access care.

It has already improved patient satisfaction at Lakeside General.

It will guarantee better quality of health care.

It will focus on complex cases by reducing simpler ones.

What does Mr. Bennett imply by mentioning Lakeside General's experience?

That reducing appointment times doesn't negatively affect all hospitals.

That every hospital should follow exactly the same path.

That different hospitals face unique challenges based on demographics.

That more appointments could improve accessibility, not necessarily satisfaction.

What does Dr. Collins mean by 'reports might not highlight the hidden challenges'?

Reports may overlook specific, nuanced patient needs.

Reports are only useful for straightforward appointments.

Reports are inaccurate and misleading.

Reports might not fully capture patient satisfaction details.

How does Dr. Collins view the potential impact on staff?

Staff may experience increased stress and burnout.

Staff might struggle with the pace of increased appointment numbers.

Staff concerns are adequately addressed in reports.

Staff might not necessarily be motivated by an increased workload.

What do both speakers agree on regarding the proposed changes?

The changes could affect the hospital's reputation if not carefully considered.

Complex cases should always have longer appointment times.

The changes should be implemented immediately.

Patient satisfaction will definitely improve with these changes.

Resources
Exams
C2 Proficiency
Test 2

C2 Proficiency listening test 2

Proposal to shorten hospital appointments

A conversation between two people, followed by six multiple-choice questions, in the format of the C2 Proficiency listening paper.

4:28 of audio · Speakers: Dr. Collins & Mr. Bennett

How to do it

1.Listen to the whole thing once, without pausing and without reading the questions.
2.Read the questions and listen a second time. The real exam gives you two listenings.
3.Answer and submit. Don't open the transcript before you submit — that's the part that makes the test count.

Test audio

Questions

1.What is Dr. Collins's initial stance on reducing appointment times?
She is concerned about complex cases being rushed.She thinks it's a straightforward solution to reduce waiting lists.She believes it could be beneficial for patient care.She is skeptical of uncritically adopting strategies from other hospitals.
2.What is Mr. Bennett's main argument for reducing appointment times?
It has already improved patient satisfaction at Lakeside General.It will allow more patients to access care.It will guarantee better quality of health care.It will focus on complex cases by reducing simpler ones.
3.What does Mr. Bennett imply by mentioning Lakeside General's experience?
That every hospital should follow exactly the same path.That reducing appointment times doesn't negatively affect all hospitals.That different hospitals face unique challenges based on demographics.That more appointments could improve accessibility, not necessarily satisfaction.
4.What does Dr. Collins mean by 'reports might not highlight the hidden challenges'?
Reports may overlook specific, nuanced patient needs.Reports are only useful for straightforward appointments.Reports are inaccurate and misleading.Reports might not fully capture patient satisfaction details.
5.How does Dr. Collins view the potential impact on staff?
Staff might struggle with the pace of increased appointment numbers.Staff concerns are adequately addressed in reports.Staff may experience increased stress and burnout.Staff might not necessarily be motivated by an increased workload.
6.What do both speakers agree on regarding the proposed changes?
Complex cases should always have longer appointment times.The changes should be implemented immediately.Patient satisfaction will definitely improve with these changes.The changes could affect the hospital's reputation if not carefully considered.

Full transcript

Open it only after you've submitted.

Dr. Collins: I've been considering the proposal about slashing appointment times from fifteen to ten minutes. It claims we could schedule in up to 9,000 more patients annually. But, really, what about the complex cases that inevitably take more time? These aren't just numbers on a page; we're talking about real patients with nuanced needs. The unexpected issues that arise can't simply be quantified in a spreadsheet. Maybe I'm missing something here.

Mr. Bennett: You’re right to bring up concerns about outliers, but they’re not the majority of what we see. Most follow-ups are fairly straightforward, and those are the ones we can streamline. Think about it: by processing 9,000 additional appointments each year, we’re significantly reducing waiting lists, which is no small feat. More patients served means more people getting the care they need. Efficiency doesn't necessarily mean cutting corners.

Dr. Collins: I suppose efficiency's the goal, but—

Mr. Bennett: Just for some perspective, lots of other hospitals have gone down this path without any detrimental impact. Take Lakeside General, for instance—they saw a 25% boost in patient turnover last year after similar adjustments. It’s important to note that their patient satisfaction didn’t plummet. Actually, I’ve read their reports, and it seems more appointments translated to better overall accessibility. Isn’t that a goal we should pursue?

Dr. Collins: Okay, but Lakeside General doesn’t exactly mirror our patient demographics, does it? I'd venture to say their reports might not highlight the hidden challenges.

Mr. Bennett: They do mention some challenges...

Dr. Collins: That's the thing with reports—they can gloss over the real grit. And what about the nuances those patients might miss out on when they answer satisfaction surveys?

Mr. Bennett: Sure, but we can’t ignore tangible, quantifiable gains. Serving more patients should be a priority. We have the flexibility to accommodate exceptions when needed, though. Even shaving off five minutes per slot can add up across thousands of appointments. Isn’t it worth considering the overall benefit?

Dr. Collins: I get that perspective, but are we really—

Mr. Bennett: That's true, but what about long-term quality?

Dr. Collins: Thinking beyond today, the broader picture includes quality. If a complex case walks through the door, and we need to rush it to adhere to schedules, we might end up with—

Mr. Bennett: Well, that’s a fair worry...

Dr. Collins: We could end up sacrificing thorough consultations. That could lead to misdiagnosis or critical issues being missed. Patients may not directly voice complaints, but believe me, they notice these things. And then there's the staff to consider, too. Pushing them harder could lead to burnout, and that's certainly not in any report.

Mr. Bennett: Hmm, you’ve got a really valid point there.

Dr. Collins: Efficiency is crucial, no doubt, but if we're trading quality for quantity, we could be sliding down a slippery slope.

Mr. Bennett: There might be a potential middle ground. Perhaps setting aside longer slots for those intricate cases would work. We could streamline the straightforward ones, as many other hospitals manage. By employing some creative staffing solutions, we could balance the needs. More accessibility doesn't have to mean compromising quality, does it?

Dr. Collins: Exploring options might be wise, but I'm still not convinced.

Mr. Bennett: Completely understandable. Striking the right balance can be quite the challenge.

Dr. Collins: We have to be cautious. Implementing these changes without thorough consideration could harm our hospital's reputation if anything goes awry.

Mr. Bennett: Agreed, it’s certainly a risk worth noting.

Dr. Collins: While the idea’s not inherently flawed, we need to make sure we’re not overlooking the complexities involved. It would be unwise to rush into this without fully understanding every aspect involved.

Mr. Bennett: Absolutely, it’s something to be approached with care.

Dr. Collins: So, let’s commit to reviewing every angle before we move forward. More time and data might illuminate paths we hadn't considered.

Mr. Bennett: Yes, more data would undoubtedly assist in making a more informed decision.

More tests at this level

Test 1 — Literary Prize Jury Debate4:26
Test 3 — Podcast interview with retired diplomat on a negotiation failure4:33
Test 4 — Success in architecture versus personal fulfillment3:06

FROM WHAT YOU READ TO WHAT YOU SAY

Listening improves by listening; speaking is a different test

A test tells you where you are. What moves your level is using the language in real time, getting it wrong, and being corrected in the moment — which is exactly what Fluvia does.

Practise speaking→

Maya · live

Tell me something you learned today.

YouI have 25 years.

✦ A more natural wayI’m 25 years old.

Unofficial practice material. Fluvia is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cambridge Assessment English. Exam names are used only to describe the format this material imitates.