How to practise English speaking with AI: the drills that work, the best apps and how to choose one (2026)

An AI will let you speak English for thirty minutes a day, never get bored of your mistakes and never make you self-conscious. It will also let you talk for months without improving, if you use it the way most people do. This is what actually works, what to avoid, and which app fits which problem.

Verified 24 September 2026 against each app’s own pricing page.

A learner speaking English out loud with an earphone in while an AI assistant shows a correction beside her: “I am” struck through and replaced with “I was”.
Nine apps you can speak English with, at a glance
AppWhat it isWhat is freeWhat it costs afterWhat it corrects
FluviaSpoken conversation with 18 AI voices in seven accents, correcting you as you speakConversations free with no expiry, no account and no card; listening tests, dictation, writing correction, idioms, phrasal verbs and vocabulary unlimitedFrom US$5 a month, billed yearlyGrammar, vocabulary and phrasing the moment you slip; the mistakes you repeat come back
ChatGPT (voice mode)General assistant with voice conversationVoice included on the free plan, with a daily and monthly cap on minutesPlus, around $20 a monthWhatever you ask for, if you ask each session; no memory of your mistakes
ELSA SpeakPronunciation coach, with sample conversationsLimited daily lessons and sample AI conversationsPremium, around $13 a month billed yearlySounds and accent, sound by sound; grammar barely
SpeakGuided speaking course with AI7-day trial; no permanent free tierPremium, around $18 a month or around $84 a yearInside its lessons, sentence by sentence
PraktikaAI avatar tutors7-day trial that asks for a card firstAround $8 a month billed yearlyPronunciation, grammar and vocabulary, at the end of each turn
LooraAI English tutor by voiceShort trial, then a subscription$19.99 a month or $119.99 a yearOne coached conversation a day, corrected at the end
TalkPalAI tutor for 130+ languages, English among them10 minutes a day with an account; a 14-day Premium trialPremium monthly or yearly; the price varies by countryChat feedback and a pronunciation tool; daily AI feedback is Premium
GliglishAI conversation partner10 minutes a day, no sign-upPaid plans remove the capFeedback on the conversation; pronunciation feedback is paid
HelloTalkLanguage exchange with real peopleMost of the appVIP, around $7 a monthWhatever your human partner chooses to correct

What speaking to an AI actually fixes, and what it does not

Most people who cannot speak English can already read it. They know the grammar, they have the vocabulary, and they still go quiet when somebody asks them a question. That gap is not knowledge, it is retrieval speed: finding the word while a person waits is a different skill from recognising it on a page, and it is trained only by doing it under time pressure.

That is the one thing an AI is genuinely good for. It gives you the time pressure, in volume, at a price no human can match, and it will not sigh when you take four seconds to find a word. Thirty minutes a day with an AI is more speaking than most learners get in a month of classes.

What it does not give you is a reason to care. A person who is waiting for your answer, who will misunderstand you if you get it wrong, who might laugh — that pressure is real in a way a patient machine is not. The honest position is that an AI is the gym and conversations with people are the sport.

The drills that work

Talk for three minutes without stopping. Pick a topic, start, and do not pause to look for a word. When you cannot find one, say something clumsy and keep going. The point is not the quality of the three minutes, it is training yourself out of the freeze. Most people discover they can say almost anything if they stop trying to say it well.

Ask for one kind of correction at a time. A machine that corrects everything at once produces a wall of feedback you will not read. Ask for articles this week, verb tenses next week, prepositions after that. One category, repeated until it stops appearing, beats a complete report you skim and forget.

Retell something instead of discussing it. Listen to two minutes of anything and tell the AI what was said. This forces you to produce structures you did not choose, which is what a real conversation does and what a free-form chat never does — in an open chat you steer towards the words you already own.

Rehearse the conversation you are actually afraid of. Not "travel" or "technology" but the specific thing: the call to the landlord, the interview, the moment at the counter when the person asks something you did not expect. Practising the situation you dread is worth ten sessions of pleasant small talk about hobbies.

Repeat the correction out loud. When the AI gives you a better phrasing, say it. Reading it does nothing. The mouth has to make the shape before it belongs to you, and that is thirty seconds of work most people skip.

The mistakes that keep people at the same level for years

Using a general assistant without telling it what to do. Out of the box, ChatGPT and its cousins are built to be agreeable. They will understand your broken sentence, answer it warmly, and never mention that it was broken. If you use one, tell it every session: correct my important mistakes, ask me one question at a time, do not switch to my language. Without that instruction you are having a pleasant chat, not a lesson.

Practising in text because it is more comfortable. Typing gives you time to think, delete and rewrite — the three things a real conversation removes. If you can write well and speak badly, more typing will not close that gap; it is the gap.

Choosing topics you can already handle. Comfortable topics feel like progress and are not. If you finish a session without once being stuck, the session was too easy.

Never repeating anything. A mistake corrected once and never seen again is a mistake you will make again next month. Whatever tool you use, the thing that moves your level is the same error coming back until it stops appearing — which is why memory across sessions matters more than any single feature.

Collecting apps instead of using one. A subscription you open twice is worse than a free tier you open daily. Almost nobody needs two speaking apps; the honest exception is pairing a conversation app with a pronunciation tool, because those genuinely do different jobs.

How to choose one, by the problem you actually have

You freeze when someone speaks to you. You need volume and immediate correction, not lessons. Gliglish gives ten minutes a day with no account at all; ChatGPT's voice mode gives you a capped allowance if you instruct it properly every time; Fluvia corrects you mid-sentence rather than in a report at the end and brings your repeated mistakes back.

People ask you to repeat words. That is pronunciation, and ELSA is the specialist. It is not a conversation app and it does not pretend to be. Using it alongside a conversation app is the one pairing worth paying for twice.

You want structure and a path. Speak is built as a course with an order to it, in exchange for a subscription and no permanent free tier. Praktika does something similar with avatar tutors, behind a card.

You want a person. HelloTalk is free for most of what it does, and the catch is that your partner corrects whatever they feel like correcting, whenever they feel like it. It is the cheapest way to get real stakes and the least reliable way to get feedback.

You are not sure yet. Start with whatever asks for nothing. Gliglish and Fluvia both let you talk without an account or a card, which means you can find out in five minutes whether being corrected while you speak is what you have been missing.

How the figures were checked

Every figure in the table was read on each app's own pricing page or store listing, on the date above. Prices and free tiers move; this table is re-checked and re-dated when they do.

Frequently asked questions

Can you really learn to speak English with an AI?
You can learn to speak fluently with one, in the sense of retrieving words fast and stopping less. What an AI cannot give you is the pressure of a person who might misunderstand you, so the fastest route is an AI most days for volume and people occasionally for stakes.
How long a session, and how often?
Fifteen to thirty minutes, most days, beats two hours on Sunday. Speaking is a motor skill and motor skills respond to frequency. A session short enough that you will do it tomorrow is the right length.
Is ChatGPT enough on its own?
It can be, if you give it teacher instructions every single session and you are disciplined about voice rather than text. What it will not do is remember which mistakes you keep making, so the work of tracking your own patterns falls on you.
Which of these can I try without an account or a card?
Gliglish and Fluvia. Everything else in the table wants at least an email first, and Praktika asks for a card before the trial starts.
What level do I need to start?
Enough to hold a simple exchange — roughly A2. Below that a conversation has nothing to work with and a course is the better use of your time. From B1 upwards, speaking practice is usually the thing that has been missing.