C1 Advanced listening test 5

Discussing an investor's offer for the restaurant

A conversation between two people, followed by six multiple-choice questions, in the format of the C1 Advanced listening paper.

4:38 of audio · Speakers: Sam & Jenna

How to do it

  1. 1.Listen to the whole thing once, without pausing and without reading the questions.
  2. 2.Read the questions and listen a second time. The real exam gives you two listenings.
  3. 3.Answer and submit. Don't open the transcript before you submit — that's the part that makes the test count.

Test audio

Questions

  1. 1.What is the primary concern Sam expresses about accepting the investor's offer?
  2. 2.What is Jenna most worried about regarding menu changes?
  3. 3.What does Sam mention as a potential benefit of the investor's involvement?
  4. 4.What inference can be made about Sam and Jenna's financial situation?
  5. 5.What does Jenna mean by 'a double-edged situation'?
  6. 6.What possible solution do Sam and Jenna consider to balance the offer's risks and benefits?
Full transcript

Open it only after you've submitted.

Sam: So, Jenna, about the investor's offer... It’s tempting, right? I mean, $50,000 could finally replace that rickety oven we’ve got and even revamp the outdoor seating. We've been struggling since the food festival debacle on August 15th. But, uh, have you thought about what we're giving up here? I kind of like the freedom, you know? Our place, our rules. Handing over, like, 30% control feels like a big shift.

Jenna: Yeah, it’s a lot to consider. The cash would definitely help, especially with the oven situation and the patio upgrade. But there’s more at stake than just finances. I mean, what about our menu? If he steps in, we might have to compromise on the creativity we've built it around, especially those Tuesday tapas specials.

Sam: I’m just worried about giving up control.

Jenna: Well, the thing is, he wants 30% control. I mean, this was supposed to be our little thing, right? Built from scratch with our own hands. And with someone else’s say over the menu decisions, we might end up serving those... generic dishes, like stuff from that chain down on 5th Avenue. We’d lose some of that unique charm we have, wouldn’t we? Plus, there’s the cultural nights we do every Thursday. Will they still fit?

Sam: Yeah, that’s definitely something. But didn't he also offer marketing support? Like, getting us featured in that local magazine, 'The City Bites'? That could pull in some new faces, especially since our usual crowd kinda dropped off after the festival.

Jenna: He did. The magazine spread could be huge for us, definitely. But what if the investor starts imposing changes we hate? Our identity could shift without us even realizing it. And about the cultural nights... it’s this personal touch I’m afraid we'll lose. I mean, will people come if we start changing? That's been a Thursday night staple for, what, 18 months now?

Sam: And let's not forget about the rent hike coming in January, another 15% increase. We’re already paying $2,500 a month. It’s gonna be brutal.

Jenna: True, the landlord's bumping it up by 15%, which is another reason to consider this money seriously. But change too much, and we risk alienating our loyal regulars. They come for the personal touch, not a polished brand. What if we lose them?

Sam: Sounds risky.

Jenna: Exactly! It's a double-edged situation if you ask me. Even with the money, we're stepping into unknown territory. Like, that story you told me about 'Bistro Central' down by Union Square. They took on an investor, changed everything, and lost a chunk of their regulars over a six-month period.

Sam: I guess we've put so much into making this place ours, and suddenly the thought of—

Jenna: Changing it?

Sam: Yeah, changing it... bothers me. But, we’re kinda in a bind here. The bank loan didn't come through last month on September 10th, remember? And if business doesn’t pick up soon, we'll struggle to keep the doors open by March. That's not something I want to face. I can't imagine seeing this place shuttered.

Jenna: I get that.

Sam: I just wish there was a way to keep control and solve our financial issues. It's like trying to juggle too many things. What if there’s a compromise? Keeping our vision intact while accepting some help?

Jenna: Maybe if we negotiate, we could secure the funds without releasing so much control. But with Mr. Donovan, he's a hard-nosed negotiator. The last time we met, on October 2nd, he was adamant about having a say in operations. We could suggest a smaller percentage, though. It's not impossible, but he might balk. Maybe he'd agree to a quieter role.

Sam: Worth a shot, I suppose.

Jenna: We have to at least try. A revised offer might bridge the gaps. And maybe we could include a clause about cultural nights, keeping them untouched. That might help us convince him. He mentioned liking that idea of 'local authenticity' or something, didn’t he?

Sam: Alright, let’s think it through. Maybe present a counter-offer and see how it goes. We just need to be careful not to lose what makes us special. It's our little nook in the city, you know?

Jenna: Exactly my point!

Sam: We’ll need to be united on this, be firm but fair. I think we can do it. What’s your gut telling you? Can we balance it without compromising too much of who we are?

Jenna: My gut’s torn, honestly. But we have to do something. Maybe a small percentage and a trial period of sorts, like six months, to see how it goes. It's not perfect, but we need to act.

More tests at this level

Listening improves by listening; speaking is a different test

A test tells you where you are. What moves your level is using the language in real time, getting it wrong, and being corrected in the moment — which is exactly what Fluvia does.

Practise speaking

Unofficial practice material. Fluvia is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cambridge Assessment English. Exam names are used only to describe the format this material imitates.